A president has only so much capital to expend, both in tax dollars and public tolerance, and Barack Obama is dangerously overdrawn. He has tried to have it all on three fronts, and his administration is in serious danger of going bankrupt. He has blundered into a deepening quagmire in Afghanistan, has continued the Bush policy of buying off Wall Street hustlers instead of confronting them and is now on the cusp of bargaining away the so-called public option, the reform component of his health care program.
That insistence on equating the swindled with the swindlers is also what is wrong with the evolving health care reform plan. The assumption from the beginning, when Obama reached out to insurance companies to come up with a deal, was that they had the interest of their customers at heart. They don't, and it is the purpose of government regulation in the area of health as well as banking to even the scales between the powerful corporations and the consumers from whom they profit. That is the purpose of a public option worth its name.
Without a government program as a check on medical costs, Obama will end up with a variant of the Massachusetts program, one that forces consumers to sign up with private insurers and costs 33 percent more than the national average. He will have furthered the Bush legacy of cultivating an ever more expensive big government without improving how the people are served.
The real news in this story, imo - is that The Nation published anything that was not totally pro-Obama. The points made by the author are well taken - but certainly no surprise to those of us in this country who actually researched Obama.. The Nation only saw what it wanted to see - just as other "progressives" (and I use the term loosely.
Great article jtf.
__________________
It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union.... Men, their rights and nothing more; women, their rights and nothing less. ~Susan B. Anthony
The real news in this story, imo - is that The Nation published anything that was not totally pro-Obama. The points made by the author are well taken - but certainly no surprise to those of us in this country who actually researched Obama.. The Nation only saw what it wanted to see - just as other "progressives" (and I use the term loosely.
Great article jtf.
I had a good chuckle over that as well - the obama loving Nation has turned on him. HAHAHA.
And that's exactly why I posted it. I haven't enjoyed any of their work in a very long time.
__________________
Stand up for what is right, even if you're standing alone.
Have you also noticed that it is not as hard to find guests/call ins on Air America now that are fed up with Obama? Every time I hear this going on, it still amazes me a bit, because the Obamots were so awestruck before the campaign.
Aha, they are finally opening their minds. How about this: "A president has only so much capital to expend, both in tax dollars and public tolerance, and Barack Obama is dangerously overdrawn...."
__________________
“For everyone who's ever been counted out, but refused to be knocked out, and for everyone who works hard and never gives up, this one is for you.” - Hillary Rodham Clinton