Hillarysworld -> Republicans/GOP -> "Why Does Ken Buck Hate America? The Conservative Effort to Destroy the Separation of Church and State" (TMV, 10/27/10)
Post Info
TOPIC: "Why Does Ken Buck Hate America? The Conservative Effort to Destroy the Separation of Church and State" (TMV, 10/27/10)
I disagree strongly with the concept of separation of church and state. It was not written into the Constitution.
Now, he rightly noted that the Constitution bars “a religion that’s sanctioned by the government,” but, in his view, that “doesn’t mean that we need to have a separation between government and religion.” He specifically criticized President Obama for (supposedly) calling it a “holiday tree” instead of a Christmas tree.
But that’s exactly the point, albeit on a minor scale. Government shouldn’t, and isn’t allowed to, support one religion before or against all others. Now, I actually don’t have a problem with calling it a Christmas tree. [SNIP]
[SNIP]
Think Progress gets to the heart of the matter:
Needless to say, while the Constitution doesn’t contain the exact words “separation of church and state,” legal scholars and the courts agree it does prohibit the establishment or endorsement of religion, and that the involvement Buck wants is dangerous. As Justice Sandra Day O’Connor wrote in a concurring opinion in 1984, the government is prohibited from “making adherence to a religion relevant in any way to a person’s standing in the political community.” In 1801, Thomas Jefferson wrote that “religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God,” and argued the Constitution required “building a wall of separation between Church & State.”
Also, Buck’s charge about Obama and the White House Christmas tree doesn’t rise above the level of a crude viral e-mail hoax: or in the words of FactCheck.org, “hooey.”
That’s right, it’s all a lie, one that Buck, ignorant or not, was obviously more than willing to spread. While Obama would have been justified to call it a holiday tree, he didn’t. It was a traditional Christmas tree.
And that’s Sandra Day O’Connor who wrote that opinion — a Reagan appointee to the Supreme Court.
And that’s Thomas Jefferson, a rather more impressive authority than Ken Buck, who interpreted the Constitution as requiring a clear separation of church and state.
Why is it that if it is not in the Constitution, it is UnConstitutional? Some of these Tea Partiers are so far to the right that they belong in the hinter years of this country!
Are they really thinking that people int he US... in their constituencies are so STUPID that they do not know what "unconstitutional" actually means?
__________________
Democracy needs defending - SOS Hillary Clinton, Sept 8, 2010 Democracy is more than just elections - SOS Hillary Clinton, Oct 28, 2010
Hillarysworld -> Republicans/GOP -> "Why Does Ken Buck Hate America? The Conservative Effort to Destroy the Separation of Church and State" (TMV, 10/27/10)