Newspaper columnist, radio host (AM760), bestselling author
Posted: December 7, 2010 12:40 PM
Four pieces of news today about the tax debate leads me to the modest conclusion that America - or at least the capital that governs in its name - has gone entirely, unmistakably and undeniably bat s h i t crazy.
1. We just had an election that focused intently on the problems that come with a growing national deficit and debt. Correspondingly, almost every major poll after the election shows the majority of the country therefore doesn't want to extend Bush tax cuts on income above $250,000 a year. Nonetheless, a Democratic president who won the biggest electoral landslide in contemporary history on a promise to rescind those tax cuts - that same president is now pushing to extend those very tax cuts, thus seriously increasing the national deficit/debt.
2. President Clinton's former chief of staff, John Podesta - a man who, as head of the liberal Center for American Progress, zealously defends the economic record and model of President Clinton - just issued a press release arguing for an extension of all the Bush tax cuts in order to not "abandon the millions of Americans who are struggling to keep their families afloat." In other words, President Clinton's former chief of staff is arguing that returning to President Clinton's tax rates would "abandon the millions of Americans who are struggling to keep their families afloat."
3. The Democratic Party, which for a decade rightly argued that Bush tax cuts blew a hole in our budget and didn't spur serious economic growth, is now suddenly arguing that we must extend all the Bush tax cuts to preserve the prospect of economic growth. Somehow, the party now believes spending $60 billion a year on reducing tax rates for income above $250,000 is a better way to spur economic growth than using the same money to (as just one example cited in the New York Times) make college entirely free for half of all American students.
4. Despite Democrats controlling all branches of America's federal legislative apparatus, Republicans are governing the country. As the Huffington Post reports under the headline "Republicans achieve top goal in Obama tax-cut plan," the GOP "largely dictated the terms of President Barack Obama's proposed tax-cut compromise." This, despite the fact that to stop the Bush tax cuts, all Democrats had to do was pass nothing.
As I said, mark this day down: It's the day it became undeniably clear that we've gone completely bat s h i t crazy.
==========
I agree with David Sirota.
-- Edited by Sanders on Tuesday 7th of December 2010 01:18:43 PM
__________________
Democracy needs defending - SOS Hillary Clinton, Sept 8, 2010 Democracy is more than just elections - SOS Hillary Clinton, Oct 28, 2010
Here is what is making me "bat ****" about the whole thing. If we are going to invest all this money, why are we not INVESTING in the workforce?
My thought: Obviously, the unemployed need the money. I have NO PROBLEM with extending unemployment benefits. But why not attach those benefits with something that will pay back the nation?
You have 6 months unemployment. If you can't find work, you must enroll at your community college for retraining...yes, government paid. If you don't make passing grades, the unemployment stops. You get one pass for failing grades...one "oops" and that is it.
We need to retrain our nation's workers. They simply do not have the skills to compete in the global market. That means facing a very real, stark fact. Manufacturing is dead in this nation. It is too damn expensive here. It is why we lost all the steel mills here in Pittsburgh. But the city didn't die because we retrained ourselves and now our economy is mostly healthcare and computer sciences.
I feel that if we did this type of program...learn and earn... we would be hiring more teachers, tutors, etc...thus creating jobs and would be training our work force for the jobs of the 21st century, not the 20th.
Seems like a win-win to me. More important, it would keep the unemployed engaged and have something to show for their "work" in school. Instead of a handout, it would be a hand UP.
VH, I think your plan would work for a lot of the unemployed, especially those who don't have any education beyond high school. But here in Michigan, we have people with college degrees who can't find jobs. My brother-in-law has a degree in marketing and he was out of work for over a year. He has a job now, but we're not sure if it's going to last past Christmas. I've also come across unemployed engineers, teachers, and computer technicians. These people are already trained. In a normal recession like the ones we had in the early 1980s and early 1990s, these folks would have packed up and moved to where the jobs are. But it's nearly impossible to sell a house in this area, and if you do it will be at a huge loss.
VH, I think your plan would work for a lot of the unemployed, especially those who don't have any education beyond high school. But here in Michigan, we have people with college degrees who can't find jobs. My brother-in-law has a degree in marketing and he was out of work for over a year. He has a job now, but we're not sure if it's going to last past Christmas. I've also come across unemployed engineers, teachers, and computer technicians. These people are already trained. In a normal recession like the ones we had in the early 1980s and early 1990s, these folks would have packed up and moved to where the jobs are. But it's nearly impossible to sell a house in this area, and if you do it will be at a huge loss.