So, the White House did another whiteboard on the tax cut deal, contrasting their priorities with Republican priorities. And if you look at the deal on a pure cost basis, the President got more raw dollars in the deal. However, they get spread over an astronomically higher number of people, so on a per-person basis, the Republicans made out pretty darn well. You can see in this chart that millionaires and billionaires make out better in this deal than they would have by just extending all the Bush tax cuts.
As Ezra says, “All groups are getting more under this framework, but on an individual level, the wealthy are getting much, much more.” And if you don’t think, as I do, that we’ll end up getting much stimulus on net in the exchange, you can see the urgency in ending this tremendous transfer of wealth upward and finally doing something about the crippling inequality in this country.
It pains me to write those words, because the agreement President Obama negotiated with Republicans on tax cuts is really quite awful. I know that some progressives have come to see the package as a cleverly disguised "second stimulus," but they're just rationalizing. The fact is that nobody would start from scratch and design an economic boost offering so little bang for so many bucks.
For a two-year cost of nearly $1 trillion, we get a bit more than $300 billion worth of new measures that are truly stimulative: a cut in the payroll tax, a provision allowing businesses to write off capital investment and an extension of unemployment benefits. We'll spend the rest -- I should say borrow the rest, then spend it -- to continue existing tax breaks that obviously are not roaring engines of job growth .
The deal invests basically nothing in the nation's future . We need to be channeling money into education and clean energy, where it can help the United States remain competitive against China and other economic rivals -- not into the well-stuffed bank accounts of the rich .
Yet congressional Democrats have no real choice but to hold their noses, approve the thing and live to fight another day. The opportunity to shape a better deal -- one without those unnecessary, unfair and supremely galling tax cuts for households making more than $250,000 a year -- is long gone.
It is interesting to see that he agrees with the big numbers in the above article, especially that the existing tax breaks being continued for the rich will not yield roaring engines of job growth. And, look! hello!! There is no real investment in the future.
I disagree that the opportunity to deal is gone. The Senate can pick the House version and deal on that. It is doable -- if the President will just stop pushing the Republican scare tactics on "double dip recession" on the nation. It is simply the wrong way to think about it let alone push people to think about it. It's one of those claims on which I can only say "what are you thinking?"
Anyway, TODAY is the day to call your senators . It's going to cloture vote in the Senate at 3pm today.
__________________
Democracy needs defending - SOS Hillary Clinton, Sept 8, 2010 Democracy is more than just elections - SOS Hillary Clinton, Oct 28, 2010
called my congressman and senators day before yesterday when it was first released. I am fed up to the teeth with Obama and any senator or congressman that votes for this will not get my vote next time around.
Likewise. I have told them that I will campaign against them for a third party candidate who might have more pro-poor position in downturn leveling economy. I even emailed more senators who might be teetering on the edge and some unexpected standouts.
The vote is actually on Monday 3pm. Today, Sen.Sanders has been on a marathon filibuster run. lol. A non-Repub filibuster for a change. I hope it works.
-- Edited by Sanders on Friday 10th of December 2010 03:03:33 PM
__________________
Democracy needs defending - SOS Hillary Clinton, Sept 8, 2010 Democracy is more than just elections - SOS Hillary Clinton, Oct 28, 2010
President Obama on Monday announced the “framework” of a deal with congressional Republicans for dealing with the looming expiration of the Bush tax cuts. It’s a two-year deal, and it includes a bunch of other stuff, all at a cost about $900 billion. None of it is offset, so this will be a direct increase in the deficit. Let’s take a look at the specifics of what’s included:
1. Two-year extension of all Bush tax cuts — Income taxes will stay right where they are at least until January 2013, even for the wealthiest Americans. Obama seems to think that having this tax debate again in 2012 will be good politics for his re-election.
2. Two-year estate tax cut — Bush’s 2001 tax bill gradually scaled back the estate tax, a federal assessment on inherited wealth, to 0% in 2010. But because it was done using budget reconciliation, the bill sunsets after ten years (just like the income taxes) and the rate is scheduled to go back up on January 1st to the pre-Bush rate — 55%, with the first $675,000 being exempt. Obama’s proposal would lower this significantly for 2011 and 2012 — the first $5 million would be exempt and the rest would be taxed at 35%. This compromise is taken directly from a Sen. Blanche Lincoln [D, AR] amendment that was added to the 2010 budget resolution by a vote of 51-48 .
3. 13-month extension of federal unemployment programs — The filing deadline for federal unemployment insurance that provides benefits for people who run out of their 26 weeks of state-provided benefits without finding a job would be extended until January 2012. Essentially, this will make it possible for people who became unemployed in the past 99 weeks and still haven’t found a job to collect benefits for the same length of time as people who lost their job more than 99 weeks ago. This would not add additional weeks of benefits — 99 weeks would still be the maximum amount of time that anybody could receive benefits.
4. One-year payroll tax holiday — Social security payroll taxes, which, under current law, are split equally between employees and employers, would be reduced from 6.2% to 4.2% with all of the benefits of the reduction going to the employees. For the average U.S. salary of $50,000, this would mean tax savings of about $1,000 next year. Obama originally wanted to include an extension of his “Making Work Pay” tax credit, which provides workers up to $400 annually for all workers, but Republicans objected and the payroll tax holiday was included instead. Reducing payroll taxes is generally considered the most stimulative form of supply-side policy.
5. Two years of 100% business expensing — Businesses will be able to immediately write off 100% of the costs of new equipment purchases until 2013. Typically, the costs of equipment purchases are deducted over the life of their use. This proposal is designed to free up now money for businesses that would normally be spread over multiples years in order to encourage more hiring and investing.
6. Miscellaneous stimulus bill tax cut extensions — The lower earning threshold for the child tax credit would be extended for two years. The expanded earned income tax credit would be extended. And the American opportunity tax credit, which provides college students with a $4,000 credit in exchange for community service, would be extended.
Now, this is far from a done deal. This package is designed to get 60 votes in the Senate, but it may not pass muster in the House. The House Democratic caucus, which is generally more progressive than their Senate counterpart, is reserving the option to revolt. And Tea Party Republicans are threatening to vote “no” because of the unemployment insurance extension that is attached.
==========================
It is far from done deal. As you see this article was from 12/7. Yesterday, the House Dems Caucus overwhelmingly voted against this deal.
Today, Sen.Sanders is doing a great job on the Senate floor with his filibuster... He is really worth listening to. Watch it live on C-SPAN2 or on http://Sanders.senate.gov -- He is still on.. now in his 8th hour nearing 9th hour of filibuster.