Hillarysworld

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info
TOPIC: Whitehouse sued over free speech


gold

Status: Offline
Posts: 32
Date:
Whitehouse sued over free speech
Permalink  
 


http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/healthcare_free_speech/2009/08/27/252998.html


The Office of the President and other White House officials are defendants in a free speech lawsuit filed by a prominent physician group, and a non-profit advocate for inner-city poor.

 

 

 

The White House has “unlawfully collected information on political speech,” thereby illegally using the power of the White House to chill opposition to its plans for health care reform, according to the complaint filed in District Court for the District of Columbia, by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) and the Coalition for Urban Renewal and Education (CURE).

 

 

 

The lawsuit was prompted by the White House solicitation for the public to report any “fishy” comments to ‘flag@whitehouse.gov.’

 

Although the White House slightly revised its data collection procedure last week, the email address still exists, the illegal activity continues, and is part of an “unlawful pattern and practice to collect and maintain information” on the exercise of free speech, which “continues in violation of the Privacy Act and First Amendment even if the Defendants terminate a particular information-collection component due to negative publicity.”

 

 

 

The lawsuit outlines how the White House has employed a form of “bait-and-switch” tactic of accusing the Plaintiffs and other opponents of spreading misinformation about the Administration’s goals for healthcare reform, and thereby refusing to ‘come clean’ about its real agenda.

 

 

 

The lawsuit outlines that the White House knew that the data collection would chill free speech, and in fact, intended to do just that:

 

 

 

“43. As part of their effort to advance the White House healthcare reform agenda, Defendants have accused opponents (including Plaintiffs) of spreading misinformation on issues such as whether (a) health reform would provide public funding for abortions, (b) put “death panels” in place to deny care to the elderly or infirm, (c) amount to a government takeover of healthcare, and (d) increase healthcare costs..the Defendants and the administration have spread misinformation, semantics, and disinformation on these topics…..

 

 

 

“45. By denying and continuing to deny that healthcare reform legislation includes “death panels” that make individual life-or-death decisions on the elderly or infirm, the Defendants and the current administration have ignored and implicitly denied and continue to ignore and implicitly to deny both that their healthcare reform agenda involves rationing healthcare…”

 

 

 

“My hate mail started shortly after the White House issued the ‘fishy’ request,” said Kathryn Serkes, Director of Policy and Public Affairs for AAPS. “We were quite visible and vocal before then, so it doesn’t seem like a coincidence. Who did they share their data with? With whom might they share it?”

 

 

 

AAPS and CURE demand that the White House remove all information already collected, and further, be prohibited from collecting any personal data in the future.

 

 

 

NOTE: AAPS is a non-partisan professional association of physicians dedicated since 1943 to protection of the patient-physician relationship. CURE, founded by Star Parker, serves poor and inner-city communities through church, individual, and market-based solutions to poverty.

 

 

 

 

 

© 2009 Newsmax. All rights reserved.



__________________


Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 2818
Date:
Permalink  
 

Good for them.  I hope they are sucessful.

__________________

4459303562_3f593359a2_m.jpg



Platinum

Status: Offline
Posts: 376
Date:
Permalink  
 

I am glad they are trying, but like every other suit brought against him, it will get buried.


__________________


Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 1695
Date:
Permalink  
 

I also fear that the deck is stacked against these plaintiffs, but I admire their guts. I see them as real patriots with the goal of protecting free speech. It's disgusting and frightening that an American President actually gave someone a solid reason to sue the WH in the first place. I would love to be able to help in this effort. Should we write some letters to the editor to - as we did with Hillary's Rapid Responders?

__________________
It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union.... Men, their rights and nothing more; women, their rights and nothing less.  ~Susan B. Anthony



Diamond

Status: Offline
Posts: 1191
Date:
Permalink  
 

I don't think these guys (BO admin) are as crafty as the Republicans.  I thing they're going to get their @$$ kicked!biggrin

__________________

Barack/Barry:  If you're NOT LEGIT, then you MUST QUIT!!



Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 340
Date:
Permalink  
 

freespirit wrote:

I also fear that the deck is stacked against these plaintiffs, but I admire their guts. I see them as real patriots with the goal of protecting free speech. It's disgusting and frightening that an American President actually gave someone a solid reason to sue the WH in the first place. I would love to be able to help in this effort. Should we write some letters to the editor to - as we did with Hillary's Rapid Responders?




I agree, but at least they are trying.  Freedom of Speech is rapidly becoming a thing of the past . . .  it is happening right before our eyes.  Yes, I would like to see us start to become more active, as we were in the past.



__________________


Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard