But Friday's news—Obama at 49 percent—is indeed symbolically significant. It will immediately impact the health care debate, albeit intangibly and perhaps only slightly. It will be more difficult for the White House to pressure moderate Democrats.
Obama owes most of this year's decline to independents. But Obama's newly weak standing is also due to the loss of still-more Republicans and to a lesser extent, some Democrats.
Democrats need not panic. Most modern re-elected presidents fall below 50 at some point in their first term. But his early popularity (nearly at 70) means that few have, so quickly, fallen as much as Obama. Obama's public approval suffered the worst third quarter (July 20 to October 19) decline of any elected president in the post-war era, according to Gallup.
In a time of tracking polls, Obama can recover and fall in a matter of days. After W. Bush fell below 50 in January and February 2004, he fluctuated in the 40s and low 50s throughout the year. Bush's long dive began in his second term.
Obama first saw 50 in late August, according to the Gallup tracking poll. We've known since then, with an eye on how other presidents dealt with that milestone, that: For Obama, The Fall Below 50% Looms.
Now Obama is here, a president without the majority. I've written before that public approval is the currency of political capital. Now we'll witness—as Democrats struggle to extricate health care from its legislative quagmire—how Obama governs without the riches of what was, last January, soaring public support. These are the periods that test presidents.
"Gallup suggests that most presidents dip below 50% but then recover and sometimes get reelected. However, Obama’s looting economic policies, foreign policy dithering and applause seeking, and domestic scams and flim-flams are sure to continue a downward trend no matter what momentary bobs up and down occur. The downward trajectory is clear.
Being a cynic, I don't believe these numbers mean diddly to obama and the democrats in control. They are set on shoving their agenda on us and they won't let polls stop them. We are screwed any way we look at it.
Imo, he made the remark about maybe not running in 2012 because he does see the polls and his ego will not stand a loss. He won't run if he feels he might lose. He is covering his bases. I also believe *they* are currently grooming whomever they chose to take his puppet place, be that 2012 or 2016.