Hillarysworld

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info
TOPIC: "Starting Gate: Are You Experienced?" (CBS News Horserase blog 11/20/2007)


Diamond

Status: Offline
Posts: 4567
Date:
"Starting Gate: Are You Experienced?" (CBS News Horserase blog 11/20/2007)
Permalink  
 


Nearly a year into the 44th Presidency, it may be time to look back a bit at the campaign.


CBSNews.com HorseRace Blog
"
November 20, 2007 8:36 AM

Starting Gate: Are You Experienced?


image3487238m.jpg
(AP Photo)

Hillary Clinton yesterday emphasized the importance of experience while stumping in Iowa even as new evidence emerged showing voters in that state are more interested in change. "There is one job we can't afford on-the-job training for – our next president," Clinton said in an economic speech. "That could be the costliest job training in history. Every day spent learning the ropes is another day of rising costs, mounting deficits and growing anxiety for our families. And they cannot afford to keep waiting."

It's the crux of Clinton's campaign message. Whether the issue is the economy, health care or the war in Iraq, Clinton argues that she understands the process, knows how to pull the levers of power and has learned from mistakes of the past. While John Edwards tries to turn that experience against her by arguing she is too beholden to the established system, Barack Obama largely dismisses the importance of experience altogether.

Obama consistently questions the value of Clinton's eight years spent as First Lady, often pointing out that he has spent more time in elective office that the New York Senator. Responding to Clinton's pitch yesterday, Obama retorted, "My understanding is she wasn't Treasury secretary in the Clinton administration. I don't know exactly what experience she's claiming. Rather than just assert experience, if she has specific differences with me in regard to economic policy then let's have that debate."

In an Iowa contest which has been a virtual dead-heat between the top three Democrats for months, there are signs that Obama may be winning that argument – or at least benefitting from the desire for change. In the latest Washington Post/ABC News poll, Obama not only holds a slim four-point lead, he also appears to be on the right side of the state's Democrats on the experience v. change argument. Fifty-five percent of those polled said their number one priority was a "new direction and new ideas" while just 33 percent said they are seeking "strength and experience."

Obama is fond of saying that experience doesn't count for much when the wrong judgments are made and uses his initial opposition to the war in Iraq to underscore the point. Iowa remains ground zero for the Democratic race and Clinton recently shifted a whole lot of resources to the state. She may need more than staff and money, however, to hold back Obama if Iowa Democrats come down on the side of change over experience.

More . . .
"
===================

If only...


-- Edited by Sanders on Saturday 2nd of January 2010 10:06:55 AM

__________________
Democracy needs defending - SOS Hillary Clinton, Sept 8, 2010
Democracy is more than just elections - SOS Hillary Clinton, Oct 28, 2010

Madam Secretary Blog at ForeignPolicy.com
Project Vote Smart - Stay informed and engaged!


Diamond

Status: Offline
Posts: 1191
Date:
Permalink  
 

Well, we've seen that Obama is NOT ABOUT CHANGE, but the SAME OLD, SAME OLD.  Democrats are now officially PI$$ED OFF AS HELL AT HIM.  I'm reading over and over at CommonDreams.org that there will BE NO 2012 RE-INSERTION for Barry.biggrin

__________________

Barack/Barry:  If you're NOT LEGIT, then you MUST QUIT!!



Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 2818
Date:
Permalink  
 

I have a feeling that old Barry isn't going to run in 2012

__________________

4459303562_3f593359a2_m.jpg



Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 1695
Date:
Permalink  
 

And Obama just keeps saying "Change takes time". Well, if he had possessed the experience and deep understanding of the issues that Hillary did, he would have known that change would take time. Surely, had he fully understood the complicated nature of huge issues like war, Gitmo, etc. he would have recognized that "change takes time" before he made all those lofty promises. But, would he have still promised - I believe so. With MSM praising him every minute of every day, and the masses of Obama-kids chanting his name (like a bunch of brain-washed trippers) the stage was set to have Americans (who failed to think critically) believe anything Obama said. He knew this and used it. He said one thing to the lefties, the opposite to the moderates. He played the game. I think he actually began to believe his own hype, and thought that he could miraculously be able to effortlessly provide wonderful leadership for America (well, he is a narcissist, if nothing else). I also don't think his goal was ever to really work hard at problem solving and governing. His goal was to get attention, accolades, money, power, acclaim. Now that he's not getting these needs met, there's a problem. I don't think he gets it - even now. We're in serious trouble. America is suffering and weakening. No one gives a damn about whether Obama is working out at the gymn, or taking MO out to dinner at expensive restaurants. Americans want a president who knows what the hell he's doing.

Obviously Obama's inexperience has resulted in one fiasco after another. We knew how important it was to elect someone who was well qualified to be POTUS, and we knew that person was Hillary. I guess the rest of the country knows that now, as well.

__________________
It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union.... Men, their rights and nothing more; women, their rights and nothing less.  ~Susan B. Anthony

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard