Hillarysworld

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info
TOPIC: "Reid's numbers go from bad to worse; faces heat over 'negro dialect' comment" (Washington Examiner - blog 1/9/10)


Diamond

Status: Offline
Posts: 4567
Date:
"Reid's numbers go from bad to worse; faces heat over 'negro dialect' comment" (Washington Examiner - blog 1/9/10)
Permalink  
 


dc_logo21.png

blog_banner611DC.png
"

Reid's numbers go from bad to worse; faces heat over 'negro dialect' comment

By: David Freddoso
Online Opinion Editor
01/09/10 1:17 PM EST

The Las Vegas Review-Journal reports on its most recent Mason-Dixon survey of Nevada registered voters:

• 52 percent had an unfavorable opinion of Reid, 33 percent had a favorable view and another 15 percent said they're neutral. In early December, a Mason-Dixon poll put his unfavorable-favorable rating at 49-38. The lowest Reid's popularity had slipped before in the surveys was 50 percent -- in October, August and May of 2009, when Mason-Dixon started tracking the senate race for the Review-Journal.

• Sue Lowden, former Nevada Republican Party chairwoman, would get 50 percent of the vote to Reid's 40 percent with 10 percent undecided.

• Danny Tarkanian, a businessman and former UNLV basketball star, would gain 49 percent of the vote to Reid's 41 percent.

• And Sharron Angle, a former Reno assemblywoman, would get 45 percent of the vote to Reid's 40 percent, a strong showing given her low name recognition statewide -- 42 percent don't know her.

The article discusses speculation that Reid will retire -- which he adamantly denies.

Meanwhile, Reid is now facing a new controversy, reports Ben Smith of Politico.

Harry Reid is apologizing this morning for casting candidate Barack Obama's light skin and lack of "Negro dialect" as selling points in his run for president.



__________________
Democracy needs defending - SOS Hillary Clinton, Sept 8, 2010
Democracy is more than just elections - SOS Hillary Clinton, Oct 28, 2010

Madam Secretary Blog at ForeignPolicy.com
Project Vote Smart - Stay informed and engaged!


Platinum

Status: Offline
Posts: 201
Date:
Permalink  
 

And they wanted to tar and feather Bill and Hillary as racists over bill remark that something obama said was a fairytale.  Unbeleive of course the media will probably let this slide.    I would be offended if some called me a negro.  And now its made the real reason he supported Barack, not that we didnt know cause he was black but not to black and could basically didn't speak black unless he had too. 



__________________


Diamond

Status: Offline
Posts: 4567
Date:
Permalink  
 

Yes Rachel, they were quick to ding Pres.Bill Clinton in order to smear Hillary Clinton.
Reid knew exactly what he was saying and candidate Obama knew and benefited from it; and of course, he is not any unhappy and can be overtly magnanimous in accepting Sen.Reid's sham apology.

Here's another good article on this.

header.jpg
"

Harry Reid: Obama 'Light-Skinned’ 'with No Nego Dialect'

by Mike Flynn

HarryReid1

Saturday is my favorite day to read the newspaper. That’s the day reporters and editors print stories they know they have to cover but don’t want to get wide attention. The latest evidence for this theory is the Washington Post’s treatment of the revelation of remarks made by Sen. Harry Reid during the 2008 Presidential campaign:

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) apologized today for referring to President Barack Obama as “light skinned” and “with no Negro dialect” in private conversations during the 2008 presidential campaign.

“I deeply regret using such a poor choice of words,” said Reid in a statement. “I sincerely apologize for offending any and all Americans, especially African Americans for my improper comments.”

Poor choice of words? Exactly what other combination of words could Sen. Reid have used to convey his point? And what, exactly, was his point anyway? What was the relevance of these observations? We don’t have the full context for the remark in the Post’s reporting. It simply notes that Reid’s comments are revealed in a new book, “Game Change”, authored by reporters from Time and New York magazines.

Interesting that the two magazine reporters, Mark Halperin and John Heileman, have been sitting on their knowledge of Reid’s remarks for so long. Holding onto such a scoop to promote book sales would be understandable, except that the incident doesn’t even make it into the promotional blurb for the book. Just move along, nothing to see here.

Which got me thinking about Trent Lott

You remember him, right? The former Mississippi Senator was Senate Majority Leader back in 2002. Attending a birthday party for then Sen. Strom Thurmond, Sen. Lott made an idiotic statement:

‘When Strom Thurmond ran for president, we voted for him. We’re proud of it. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn’t have had all these problems over all these years, either.”

As you can imagine, a firestorm ensued. Kweisi Mfume, then President of the NAACP said that Lott’s remarks were:

“the kind of callous, calculated, hateful bigotry that has no place in the halls of Congress”

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX) said:

“It was shocking…a piercing voice through the fabric of black America”

Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) went even further:

”I simply do not believe the country can today afford to have someone who has made these statements again and again be the leader of the United States Senate”

It will be curious to see if Sen. Kerry thinks the country can afford to have Sen. Reid as leader of the Senate.

More . . .

"

----------------------------

Can Harry get any more harried?



__________________
Democracy needs defending - SOS Hillary Clinton, Sept 8, 2010
Democracy is more than just elections - SOS Hillary Clinton, Oct 28, 2010

Madam Secretary Blog at ForeignPolicy.com
Project Vote Smart - Stay informed and engaged!
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard