Riding a wave of opposition to Democratic health-care reform, GOP upstart Scott Brown is leading in the U.S. Senate race, raising the odds of a historic upset that would reverberate all the way to the White House, a new poll shows.Although Brown’s 4-point lead over Democrat Martha Coakley is within the Suffolk University/7News survey’s margin of error, the underdog’s position at the top of the results stunned even pollster David Paleologos.
“It’s a Brown-out,” said Paleologos, director of Suffolk’s Political Research Center. “It’s a massive change in the political landscape.”
The poll shows Brown, a state senator from Wrentham, besting Coakley, the state’s attorney general, by 50 percent to 46 percent, the first major survey to show Brown in the lead. Unenrolled long-shot Joseph L. Kennedy, an information technology executive with no relation to the famous family, gets 3 percent of the vote. Only 1 percent of voters were undecided.
Paleologos said bellweather models show high numbers of independent voters turning out on election day, which benefits Brown, who has 65 percent of that bloc compared to Coakley’s 30 percent. Kennedy earns just 3 percent of the independent vote, and 1 percent are undecided.
Given the 4.4-point margin of error, the poll shows Coakley could win the race, Paleologos said. But if Brown’s momentum holds, he is poised to succeed the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy - and to halt health-care reform, the issue the late senator dubbed “the cause of my life.”
Yet even in the bluest state, it appears Kennedy’s quest for universal health care has fallen out of favor, with 51 percent of voters saying they oppose the “national near-universal health-care package” and 61 percent saying they believe the government cannot afford to pay for it.
The poll, conducted Monday through Wednesday, surveyed 500 registered likely voters who knew the date of Tuesday’s election. It shows Brown leading all regions of the state except Suffolk County.
“Either Brown’s momentum accelerates and his lead widens, or this becomes a wake-up call for Coakley to become the ‘Comeback Kid’ this weekend,” Paleologos said.
And with 99 percent having made up their minds, voters may be hard to persuade.
The poll surveyed a carefully partitioned electorate meant to match voter turnout: 39 percent Democrat, 15 percent Republican and 45 percent unenrolled.
Brown wins among men and is remarkably competitive among women - trailing Coakley’s 50 percent with 45 percent.
While Brown has 91 percent of registered Republicans locked up, an astonishing 17 percent of Democrats report they’re jumping ship for Brown as well - likely a product of Coakley’s laser-focus on hard-core Dems, potentially at the exclusion of other Democrats whom she needed to win over, Paleologos said.
For Coakley, Brown’s surge may be as ominous as the fact that her campaign’s peril is not fully recognized, with 64 percent of voters still believing she’ll win - a perception that threatens to keep her supporters home.
Brown’s popularity is solid. He enjoys a 57 percent favorability rating compared to just 19 percent unfavorable. Coakley’s favorability is 49 percent; her unfavorability, 41 percent.
No longer does Brown suffer from a name-recognition problem, with 95 percent of voters having heard of him statewide.
7News Political Editor Andy Hiller said, “Voters obviously think Brown is running a better campaign than Coakley. For months, it has been Coakley’s race to lose, and now in the last days that’s exactly what she may be doing.”
It has been interesting to read all the discussion about this race over the last couple of days. Boston Gal and Cynthia Ruccia at TNA each have posted articles - both are more pro Coakley than con, but recognizing some of the concerns. http://thenewagenda.net/blog/. Hillbuzz has been on a roll for some time now about the advantages of electing "Hottie McAwsome" (Brown). http://hillbuzz.org/. And, The Confluence had an open thread on the race today. Again, some comments favorable to Coakley, some, not so much. One comment described Brown as "Bush on steroids" - pretty scary. http://riverdaughter.wordpress.com/
Interesting reading, and it will be interesting to see who wins. Frankly, given the fact that Coakley had the guts to stick with Hill until the bitter end and beyond, I would be inclined to vote for her if I lived in MA.
__________________
It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union.... Men, their rights and nothing more; women, their rights and nothing less. ~Susan B. Anthony
VH, going forward, just use big bold " sign just before and after the article except. "
This is definitely quite interesting. This past year has not been good for Coakley - a couple of big gaffes from her and her strategist are not boding well. Brown on the other hand has pressed hands despite cold and snow in Fenway (LOL) and not pushed anyone to the curbside.
__________________
Democracy needs defending - SOS Hillary Clinton, Sept 8, 2010 Democracy is more than just elections - SOS Hillary Clinton, Oct 28, 2010
One of the big things I see is that Mass. (Kennedy's) have had that seat for just about 60 years, and now is the time for Mass. to change the Kennedy's grip on politics in that state. Of course the other thing in play, is just how angry Americans are (health care, tarp, housing, etc) , and how those that voted for Obama don't recognize the man he's become........they have said he's more like Bush than anything.
The other thing is Mass. has a health program, and people are afraid, very much so, that they will end up paying more.
If she doesn't win, blame it on Obama. Even if she wins by a close margin, the dems are in trouble. Needless to say the phone will be ringing in Mass. this weekend. I feel bad that Nancy Pelosi is going to show up, her image might not help Martha at all.
"I feel bad that Nancy Pelosi is going to show up, her image might not help Martha at all"
Lol. You're right about that. As noted on another thread, endorsements by the Kennedys cost her some votes. After a visit from Pelosi, she may as well withdraw from the race. lol.
I agree that if she loses, Obama will be the reason - and the Dem health care reform. You know, as badly as this country does need health care reform, you just have to wonder why the Dems didn't have the judgment to do this right. With a majority in both houses and a Dem in the white house, they could have crafted and passed something that was worth voting for - had they not been so hell bent on keeping everything secret, and pushing the bill through at the speed of light. This just seems like bad politics, not to mention really bad government. The Dems just aren't all that savvy, imo.
__________________
It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union.... Men, their rights and nothing more; women, their rights and nothing less. ~Susan B. Anthony
"I feel bad that Nancy Pelosi is going to show up, her image might not help Martha at all"
Lol. You're right about that. As noted on another thread, endorsements by the Kennedys cost her some votes. After a visit from Pelosi, she may as well withdraw from the race. lol.
I agree that if she loses, Obama will be the reason - and the Dem health care reform. You know, as badly as this country does need health care reform, you just have to wonder why the Dems didn't have the judgment to do this right. With a majority in both houses and a Dem in the white house, they could have crafted and passed something that was worth voting for - had they not been so hell bent on keeping everything secret, and pushing the bill through at the speed of light. This just seems like bad politics, not to mention really bad government. The Dems just aren't all that savvy, imo.
It is an outcome of bad leadership.
Leadership makes the difference in the tone set and the environment. When the person in leadership role speaks, you can actually feel it in the bones - just take a pulse check next time. That feeling is pervasive.
The WH has failed to channel the houses in a direction that can actually achieve the goals. If you loose focus on the goal, or fail to define it, you end up with a grab bag of hodge-podge - and you can name it anything you want, but it is going to be far from the solution that you promised. And, people can feel it - they have enough common sense to know when they have been hoodwinked on something as personal as their health care.
-- Edited by Sanders on Friday 15th of January 2010 12:20:50 PM
__________________
Democracy needs defending - SOS Hillary Clinton, Sept 8, 2010 Democracy is more than just elections - SOS Hillary Clinton, Oct 28, 2010
I supported Coakley until she promised to vote with the Dems on health care. It is HC reform that did her in.
I have decided that I am not going to just support women just because they are women. I want a woman that is going to stand up for women and this health care plan is horrible for women. She should have stuck to her guns and said she wouldn't vote for it with the stipuck and nelson admendments in there.
I can't support a candidate that wants this health care bill and big government. Another sheep in the dem fold.
I like Brown, and he stands for the founding principles of our nation. I hope he wins, but it's pretty hard to go up against unions and ACORN.
I think that's important here. You've got Brown, out there on his own. He's not rubbing elbows with the elite and getting contributions from the lobbyests. He seems like a real trooper.