ASSOCIATED CONTENT

"

Scott Brown Vs. Martha Coakley: President Obama Campaigns for Candidate on Our Dollar

January 19, 2010 by Shanika Minor


Cable news stations can barely contain themselves today as they cover the Massachusetts's election to fill the late Ted Kennedy's seat. The election is a pivotal one; if Republican candidate Scott Brown wins, the Democrats lose their 60-seat Senate majority. It's an important race, [snip]

The tight race between Democrat Martha Coakley and Republican Scott Brown has prompted President Obama to jump in and campaign on behalf of his fellow Democrat, Coakley. While we all know why he jumped in— looming fears that his Obama care won't pass without a Senate majority and a clear, partisan agenda —it's unclear why he's allowed to jump in. Doesn't he have a job to do?

While President Obama isn't the first president to campaign on a candidate's behalf, the fact remains that he shouldn't. For one, Obama clearly has a lot on his plate. As the unemployed would attest, his time would be better spent focusing his efforts on finding solutions for our nation, such as tax reductions, reducing government, encouraging private industry growth and considering other healthcare options. For two, the people of Massachusetts are smart enough to make the decision on their own, without the influence of our President. For three, it's not very bi-partisan of President Obama. While he ran as a Democrat, the moment he stepped foot into the White House, he was no longer a party player. As President, his job is to do what's right for this nation, regardless of party.

Source link

"

-- Edited by Sanders on Tuesday 19th of January 2010 06:19:59 PM