Hillarysworld -> All things Hillary -> "SOS HILLARY CLINTON ON CNN'S STATE OF THE UNION" (CNN, Youtube 2-7-10) Transcript (State.gov), Related News, blogs*****
Post Info
TOPIC: "SOS HILLARY CLINTON ON CNN'S STATE OF THE UNION" (CNN, Youtube 2-7-10) Transcript (State.gov), Related News, blogs*****
Hillary Clinton's Interview With CNN's Candy Crowley for State of the Union
QUESTION: First of all, thank you so much. It's an honor to have you on this first show. I wanted to talk to you first about the past month. We have seen a would-be terrorist frighten a lot of people on a plane over Detroit, we have gotten Usama bin Ladin's tape, and we have now been warned by the U.S. Government that it is certain that there will be an attempted attack on the U.S. or on Americans in the next one to six months. Is there a reason Americans should not look at that and think the risk factor is up?
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, Candy, first of all, congratulations on your new show. I really wish you well. You have a lot to contribute to Sunday morning television.
I think what's fair for Americans to think is that we have had a continuing threat from al-Qaida and related terrorist organizations over many years now. It hasn't gone away. We have contained it. We've worked very hard to do so. But over the last six months, we have seen attacks foiled, people arrested and charged, so that you have to be constantly vigilant. And that's what everybody working in this government at all levels attempts to do.
In the last month, because of the high-profile attempt on the airplane, people's attention became very focused. But a bin Ladin tape is nothing new; it comes and goes depending upon when he decides to do it. But I think it's really important for people to just go along with their daily lives. I mean, you can't be deterred or discouraged or fearful about what's happening, and we just have to do everything we can to keep America safe.
QUESTION: Can you give me a feel for is the risk higher, is al-Qaida stronger now than a year ago?
SECRETARY CLINTON: It's very difficult to make that kind of assessment because they've always been plotting against us. I was a senator from New York on 9/11. I was honored to serve the people of New York until I took this job. I thought about it every day. I got intelligence every day, somebody was thinking about that or we picked up information about a plot there. So to me, who has followed this very closely since 9/11, I don't see them as stronger, but I see that they are more creative, more flexible, more agile. They evolve. They are, unfortunately, a very committed, clever, diabolical group of terrorists who are always looking for weaknesses and openings, and we just have to stay alert.
QUESTION: If they're more agile and more clever, are there more of them? And doesn't that sort of add up to more risk?
SECRETARY CLINTON: I don't know if there are more of them. We have certainly degraded their capacity in Afghanistan and Pakistan. We know that. As the President said the other night, we have killed and captured a significant number of al-Qaida's top leadership as well as people in the Taliban organizations in Afghanistan and Pakistan who cooperate with them.
We see some new areas of threat emanating from Somalia and Yemen. But whether that's now in the cumulative greater, or whether because the numbers in Afghanistan and Pakistan have decreased, it's about the same but with the unfortunate fact that they are committed to killing and destroying innocent people in their own countries as well as around the world, including the United States.
QUESTION: While we're in that region, let me ask you about Afghanistan. U.S. troops cannot get out of there unless there is a stable Afghan Government. Hamid Karzai, as of this point, does not have a full cabinet. They are now trying to bring in not just foot soldiers, bring them back into the fold, not just Taliban foot soldiers, but some higher-ups. Do you have any doubt in your mind that Hamid Karzai can get his act together and put together a stable government?
SECRETARY CLINTON: I think that the strategy that the United States and more than 44 countries are pursuing in Afghanistan obviously requires that we have a good partner in President Karzai and the Afghan Government. That doesn't mean that we'll always do what he wants or he will always do what we want, but we do expect to see a level of competency and capacity.
QUESTION: Have you seen it?
SECRETARY CLINTON: Yes, actually, there are areas of very positive cooperation. He may not have a full cabinet, but the cabinet members he has are people who many of us view as honest and effective, productive. We work with them on a daily basis - the defense minister, the finance minster - people who are really producing results for Afghanistan.
I've spent a lot of time with President Karzai, most recently about a 90-minute one-on-one conversation in London. I think he has really stepped up since his second inaugural address. He laid out a roadmap there. He is trying to follow that roadmap. But I always remind myself that, what, five or six years into a new nation that has no history of democracy, let's be realistic about the kind of support that this new government and the president needs. So I think we have to put this into a more balanced perspective. It's neither as bad or as good, just like most of life and most of the situations I deal with around the world. And I think we have developed a much stronger understanding and partnership in the last year going forward.
QUESTION: So no doubts that Karzai is the man to pull this together?
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, he is the president of the country and I very much respect the authority that he has. He has asked for help, most recently at the London conference, but he also has his own ideas, as do the Afghan people. So in any relationship with any country, think of some of our oldest allies like France or England, you're not always going to get 100 percent agreement, but you work with the leaders and you work with the people. We're not yet turning the corner, but we are sort of inching our way forward to being able to do so. So I think, on balance, we are in this with people and countries who are committed to the same outcome.
QUESTION: Shall we leave the Karzai doubt question on the table?
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, I mean, I don't agree with any other single leader in the world. I mean, I don't - I mean, obviously, we have a lot -
QUESTION: I just think that's a little different from are you a little worried that he's not going to be able to pull this off. And I pursue it only because that's the only way U.S. troops are going to get pulled out.
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, but see, I think that we have looked at President Karzai through a lens that is not rooted in reality. I mean, we do business with leaders all the time, some of whom are great American allies, that have a lot of questions raised about them. But we do an assessment: What's in the best interest of America? What's in our national security? What advances our interests and our values? What keeps Americans safe?
And so why should we take one leader out and put him apart from all the other leaders we deal with and raise all those doubts, instead of saying, look, we've got work to do and we're doing it. We are doing it day by day and I think we are making progress.
(Break.)
QUESTION: I wanted to bring your attention to something that President Obama said in his inaugural a little more than a year ago: "We will extend a hand if you are willing to unclench your fist." Has Iran unclenched its fist?
SECRETARY CLINTON: No.
QUESTION: How about North Korea?
SECRETARY CLINTON: No, not to the extent we would like to see them. But I think that's - that is not all to the story. Engagement has brought us a lot in the last year. Let's take North Korea first and then we'll go to Iran.
In North Korea, when we said that we were willing to work with North Korea if they were serious about returning to the Six-Party Talks and about denuclearizing in an irreversible way, they basically did not respond in the first instance. But because we were willing to engage, we ended up getting a very strong sanctions regime against North Korea that China signed onto and Russia signed onto and right now is being enforced around the world.
QUESTION: Did the extended hand of the U.S. help in any way that you can point to?
SECRETARY CLINTON: It did. Because we extended it, a neighbor like China knew we were going the extra mile and all of a sudden said you're not just standing there hurling insults at them, you've said all right, fine, we're willing to work with them. They haven't responded, so we're going to sign on to these very tough measures.
Similarly, in Iran, I don't know what the outcome would have been if the Iranian Government hadn't made the decision it made following the elections to become so repressive. But the fact is, because we engaged, the rest of the world has really begun to see Iran the way we see it. When we started last year talking about the threats that Iran's nuclear program posed, Russia and other countries said, well, we don't see it that way. But through very slow and steady diplomacy, plus the fact that we had a two-track process - yes, we reached out on engagement to Iran, but we always had the second track, which is that we would have to try to get the world community to take stronger measures if they didn't respond on the engagement front.
QUESTION: I want to turn to Haiti for a minute. We're in there with a lot of people. They're doing a lot of talking, and what they're finding is Haitians saying we wish the American Government would come in here and take over because they don't think their government is capable in the post-rescue period of rebuilding Haiti. What's wrong with that idea?
SECRETARY CLINTON:Candy, I'm very proud of what not only our country has done, both our military and particularly our civilians and our new USAID Administrator Raj Shah - everybody has just stepped up and performed admirably. So have other countries. This has been a global response. But the fact is there is a legitimate government with authority in Haiti despite the -
QUESTION:A really weak government.
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, the fact is that we were working with them before the earthquake. One of my goals as Secretary of State, which the President agreed with, was for us to work with that government and try to help them implement a national development plan. And we had spent a lot of time on that. In fact, what's so tragically ironic is that, literally, the night before the earthquake, on PBS there was a - the NewsHour had a long segment about the progress that was being made in Haiti under this very same government. Unfortunately, all of that was upended by the earthquake.
What we're doing along with our international partners is to work with the Haitian Government so that there is a mechanism for coordination. They have to be part of it because they have the legal authorities. Unless a government or a bunch of governments is going to occupy Haiti, which would have all kinds of very unfortunate implications, we have to help support the Haitian people and their government. There's a lot of talk going on, a lot of conference calls flying back and forth, the trip that I made to Montreal for the conference, and I'm confident we're going to come up with a system.
QUESTION: UN envoy to Haiti, you may know, is Bill Clinton.
SECRETARY CLINTON: I do know.
QUESTION: I'm just curious how that works exactly. Does he give you reports? Does he call up and say, "Hello, Secretary of State?" (Laughter.) And really, who's the boss here?
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, he was appointed, again, months and months ago and was working on the private sector. He had brought hundreds of business people from around the world to sign contracts to employ people in Haiti. And now he's been asked by Secretary General Ban Ki-moon to continue and enhance his role because of the earthquake.
He talks to the people who I work with. He doesn't - it's not me. It's Raj Shah and Cheryl Mills and all the other teams.
QUESTION:He doesn't say, "Give me the big Kahuna here?"
(Laughter.)
SECRETARY CLINTON: No, I mean, he talks to people who are really working on this 24 hours a day. Obviously, we talk about it, too. We have a special place in our heart for Haiti, having gone there during our honeymoon many years ago. And it's a place that is captivating. The people are so resilient and they deserve so much better than what they've gotten over their history. And I think Bill is committed, as I am, to doing everything we can.
QUESTION: If you were to say to the American people this country is the most dangerous to Americans and to the U.S., where is that country?
SECRETARY CLINTON: Candy, in terms of a country, obviously, a nuclear-armed country like North Korea or Iran pose both a real or a potential threat.
QUESTION:And you're convinced Iran has nuclear -
SECRETARY CLINTON: No, no, no. But we believe that their behavior certainly is evidence of their intentions. And how close they are may be the subject of some debate, but the failure to disclose the facility at Qom, the failure to accept what was a very reasonable offer by Russia, France, and the U.S. through the IAEA to take their uranium, their low-enriched uranium and return it for their research reactor. I mean, there's just - it's like an old saying that if you see a turtle on a fencepost in the middle of the woods, he didn't get there by accident, right? Somebody put him there. And so you draw conclusions from what you see Iran doing.
But I think that most of us believe the greater threats are the transnational non-state networks, primarily the extremists, the fundamentalist Islamic extremists who are connected - al-Qaida in the Arab Peninsula, al-Qaida in Pakistan and Afghanistan, al-Qaida in the Maghreb. I mean, the kind of connectivity that exists. And they continue to try to increase the sophistication of their capacity, the attacks that they're going to make. And the biggest nightmare that any of us have is that one of these terrorist member organizations within this syndicate of terror will get their hands on a weapon of mass destruction. So that's really the most threatening prospect we see.
(Break.)
QUESTION: When you look at the biggest success in the past year for the open hand, where is your - I mean, the Middle East is still pretty much a mess despite some really bright minds over there trying to work it out. We've talked about Iran and North Korea and others. Where is there success of specifically engagement?
SECRETARY CLINTON: Again, I would say that this has been a very successful year for the following reasons. First, it's almost hard to remember how poorly much of the world viewed the United States when President Obama came into office. And both his election and his persona, combined with the approach we took of seeking to find the basis for engagement on mutual respect and mutual interest, has really created a much more open, receptive atmosphere. We are working in many difficult situations in every continent, but I think we're being received in a positive way, which gives us a better chance to find common ground.
Now, I am fairly realistic about foreign policy, and countries don't just give up what they view as their interests in order to make nice with you. It takes a lot of effort. But I really feel that the engagement was the first stage. We had to change the mindset of not just leaders but of their populations. We are moving toward a new nuclear arms treaty with Russia, something that has been a high priority with us. We have reset our relationship. The Russians have been very positive in discussions about sanctions on Iran and on many other important matters. I'm not sure that would have been predicted a year ago. We do have a very comprehensive engagement with India, with China, with other big countries, from South Africa to Turkey to Brazil, and we are working together on areas of mutual interest or where the United States can be a facilitator.
So I think that when I look back on this past year, I see a lot of positive trends. Now, this year, 2010, has to be a year of implementing and building on the positive foundation that we've built.
QUESTION: A quick question on healthcare, which seems to be stalled, which - and that's probably the best we can say about it. Are you getting a little deja vu watching this? (Laughter.)
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, it's really hard. It is a complex issue that touches everybody about which both people and interests have really strong feelings. But I haven't given up yet and I know the White House hasn't given up and I don't think a lot of the members of Congress have given up, so I'm not sure that this last chapter has been written.
QUESTION: Have you called anybody on the Hill or have you talked to the White House? Are you dispensing the wisdom of your time trying to figure this out?
SECRETARY CLINTON:Well, when I'm asked, I am very happy to respond. I mean, it's not anything I have direct responsibility for, but I've had a number of conversations and both in the White House and on the Hill and with others who are playing a constructive role. And I, like I think many Americans, hope that there can be a positive outcome.
QUESTION:So I want to do a quick lightning round with you. First of all, Colts or the Saints?
SECRETARY CLINTON: Oh, I don't answer football questions because, to be honest, I don't follow it. Now, if my husband were sitting here, he would give you a very long exegesis as to why one team was better than the other, but I'll just leave it to see what happens at the Super Bowl.
QUESTION: In between talking about Haiti, he doesn't say I need you to root for -
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, no, because neither of them are our teams. I mean, there's not a New York team. I mean, so we're just interested observers. *QUESTION:* Who are watching the game with or are you on the phone with foreign leaders?
SECRETARY CLINTON:Well, if they call me, I'm on the phone with them. Otherwise, it'll be my family.
QUESTION:And finally, just as the mother - recently the mother of a groom, as the mother of the bride, have you found that dress yet?
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, if you don't tell anybody, Candy, we're still looking. Yeah, and it's a new status for me being an MOTB, but I'm very proud to have that status.
QUESTION:Good luck on the search. That's all I have to say. As you know, it's -
SECRETARY CLINTON: Thank you. But your son - you didn't have to go buy a dress, so that's good. That was not part of -
QUESTION:Exactly. So no Chelsea dress either.
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, I don't have a dress yet, no, and Chelsea doesn't either. But we're working on it.
QUESTION: Well, good luck. And do you think it's - which is harder, Middle East peace or negotiating this wedding? (Laughter.)
SECRETARY CLINTON:Well, I'd probably call it a draw about now. (Laughter.)
QUESTION: Well, good luck with both, actually.
SECRETARY CLINTON:Thank you.
QUESTION: I really appreciate your being here.
SECRETARY CLINTON: And good luck to you.
QUESTION: Thank you so much. I appreciate it.
SECRETARY CLINTON: You're welcome.
"
-- Edited by Sanders on Sunday 7th of February 2010 12:49:39 PM
__________________
Democracy needs defending - SOS Hillary Clinton, Sept 8, 2010 Democracy is more than just elections - SOS Hillary Clinton, Oct 28, 2010
Washington (CNN) - President Barack Obama's strategy of engaging both Iran and North Korea has shown positive results by starting to bring together the rest of the world to act jointly against their nuclear ambitions, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said.
In an interview broadcast Sunday on CNN's State of the Union, Clinton replied with a blunt "no" when asked by CNN Senior Political Correspondent Candy Crowley if Iran had taken up Obama on his offer in his inaugural address last year to "extend a hand if you are willing to unclench your fist."
"But the fact is, because we engaged, the rest of the world has really begun to see Iran the way we see it," Clinton said in the interview conducted Thursday.
Clinton pointed out that a year ago, much of the world, including Russia, did not share the U.S. perception that Iran's nuclear program posed a major threat.
Now there is greater awareness of the threat, Clinton said, due to "a very slow and steady diplomacy plus the fact that we had a two-track process."
"Yes, we reached out on engagement to Iran, but we always had the second track which is that we would have to try to get the world community to take stronger measures if they didn't respond on the engagement front," Clinton said.
On Friday, Iran's foreign minister had said he believed a solution will be reached over the proposed deal to export uranium for enrichment abroad, as demanded by Western nations worried that Tehran plans to use its program to build nuclear weapons.
However, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Sunday he had ordered Iran's atomic chief to increase the nation's enrichment of uranium at home. Ahmadinejad did not set a deadline for the increase..
"The doors for interaction are still open," Ahmadinejad said at a ceremony marking Iran's laser technology achievements.
Washington (CNN) – She’s the nation’s top diplomat but one of her more difficult negotiations may be sartorial.
In an interview that airs Sunday on CNN’s State of the Union, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton tells CNN Senior Political Correspondent Candy Crowley that both she and daughter Chelsea are still on the look out for the perfect dresses for Chelsea’s upcoming wedding.
“Well, if you don't tell anybody, Candy, we're - we're still looking,” Clinton told Crowley, who recently had to buy a dress for her eldest son’s wedding. And it's - it's a new status for me being an MOTB [mother of the bride]. But I'm very proud to have that status,” the secretary of state added.
“Good - good luck on the search. That's all I have to say,” Crowley advised Clinton.
“We're working on it,” Clinton assured Crowley.
The secretary of state was also diplomatic about Sunday’s big Super Bowl battle between the Indianapolis Colts and the New Orleans Saints
“Oh, you know, I don't answer football questions,” Clinton said when asked who she was rooting for in Sunday’s game. “Because to be honest, I don't follow it.
“Now if my husband were sitting here,” Clinton continued, “he would give you a very long exegesis as to why one team was better than the other. But I'll just leave it to see what happens at the Super Bowl.”
Asked whether the former president has given her any suggestions about which team she should support, Clinton insisted both she and her husband had no dog in Sunday’s fight.
“Well, no. Because neither of them are our teams. I mean it - there's not a New York team. I mean we're - you know, so we're just interested observers.”
Washington (CNN) – The woman who was the face of Democratic efforts to pass a health care reform bill when the last Democratic president was in the White House says she’s happy to share her wisdom on the subject when asked.
In an interview set to air Sunday on CNN’s State of the Union, former first lady and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton weighs in on the continuing battle over health care reform on Capitol Hill.
“Are you getting a little déjà vu watching this?,” CNN Senior Political Correspondent Candy Crowley asked Clinton.
“Well it's really hard,” said Clinton. “It is a complex issue that touches everybody about which both people and interests have really strong feelings. But I haven't given up yet, and I know the White House hasn't given up. And I - I don't think a lot of the members of Congress have given up. So I'm not sure that this last chapter has been written.”
Asked whether she dispenses any wisdom garnered during her failed efforts to push a health care reform bill through Congress during his husband’s administration, Clinton said she is glad to share what she knows.
“Well when I'm asked I am very happy to respond,” Clinton said. “I mean it's not anything I have direct responsibility for, but I've had a number of conversations. And both in the White House, and on the Hill, and with others who are playing a constructive role. And I - I like I think many Americans hope that there can be a positive outcome.”
During her 2008 White House bid, Clinton’s failed push for health care reform while first lady got her commitment, if elected, to push for universal coverage dubbed “Hillarycare” by many of her conservative and Republican critics.
After beating out Clinton for the Democratic nod and then besting Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona, in the general election, President Obama made passing a health care reform one of his top domestic legislative priorities in 2009. National Democrats have thus far been unable to get a bill passed and the party suffered a large blow recently when Republican Scott Brown won a Massachusetts special Senate election last month. Sworn in last week, Brown is now the 41st member of the Senate Republican Caucus and he ran on a pledge to be the 41st vote Senate Republicans need to filibuster a Democrats’ health care reform bill.
Clinton Fears Terrorists With Weapons of Mass Destruction
February 07, 2010, 11:02 AM EST
Feb. 7 (Bloomberg) -- Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said she regards the greatest threat to the U.S. to be weapons of mass destruction in the hands of an international terrorist group.
“The biggest nightmare that many of us have is that one of these terrorist member organizations within this syndicate of terror will get their hands on a weapon of mass destruction,” Clinton told CNN’s “State of the Union” program in a taped interview. That’s “the most, yes, threatening prospect we see,” she said.
Since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks in the U.S., the al-Qaeda terrorist network has become “more creative, more flexible, more agile,” Clinton said, according to a transcript of the interview e-mailed by CNN. “They are unfortunately a very committed, clever, diabolical group of terrorists who are always looking for weaknesses and openings.”
A nuclear-armed North Korea or Iran “poses both a real or a potential threat,” Clinton said. “But I think that most of us believe the greater threats are the trans-national non-state networks. Primarily the extremists -- the fundamentalist Islamic extremists who are connected to al-Qaeda in the Arab peninsula.”
North Korea has detonated two nuclear devices and tested several missiles. The communist regime has said it isn’t willing to return to multilateral nuclear disarmament talks while the country is subject to United Nations sanctions.
Iran’s Nuclear Program
Asked if she was convinced that Iran had a nuclear weapon, Clinton said “no,” acknowledging there is “some debate” over how close they may be to developing a weapon.
The U.S., its European allies and United Nations inspectors suspect Iran is using its uranium enrichment program to build a nuclear bomb. The U.S. wants more UN sanctions aimed at halting the program, which Iran, with the world’s second-biggest oil and natural gas reserves, says is for peaceful uses such as power generation.
In a wide ranging interview with CNN’s Candy Crowley, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton defended the Obama administration’s engagement approach, saying it has helped Washington “reset” its relations with much of the world, if not yielded nuclear deals with Iran or North Korea.
“Engagement has brought us a lot in the last year,” Clinton said.
On North Korea, Clinton said, while Pyongyang hasn’t taken up the administration’s call to return to Six Party talks, “but because we were willing to engage, we ended up getting a very strong sanctions regime against North Korea that China signed onto and Russia signed onto and right now is being enforced around the world.”
“Similarly, in Iran,” Clinton continued, “the fact is, because we engaged, the rest of the world has really begun to see Iran the way we see it.”
“When we started last year talking about the threats that Iran’s nuclear program posed, Russia and other countries said, well, we don’t see it that way,” Clinton explained.
“It’s almost hard to remember how poorly much of the world viewed the United States when President Obama came into office,” Clinton said. “And both his election and his persona, combined with the approach we took of seeking to find the basis for engagement on mutual respect and mutual interest, has really created a much more open, receptive atmosphere.”
“We had to change the mindset of not just leaders but of their populations,” Clinton said, noting particular progress in the U.S.-Russian relationship over the past year.
“We are moving toward a new nuclear arms treaty with Russia, something that has been a high priority with us,” she said. “We have reset our relationship. The Russians have been very positive in discussions about sanctions on Iran and on many other important matters. I’m not sure that would have been predicted a year ago."
Clinton’s defense of the engagement approach comes as Defense Secretary Robert Gates called for new sanctions on Iran, saying it is not too late for sanctions to work.
“If the international community will stand together and bring pressure to bear on the Iranian government, I believe there is still time for sanctions and pressure to work," Gates said at a Rome press conference Sunday after meeting with his Italian counterpart. "But we must all work together."
Gates called Iran’s reaction to the international uranium fuel swap offer “very disappointing.”
The U.S., UK, France, and Russia are expected to support a new UN Security Council resolution on Iran in the coming days. China has said it doesn’t support new economic sanctions on Iran at this time, but may be persuaded to abstain from a veto or perhaps to support a mild resolution.
But Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s televised call Sunday for Iran to undertake higher enrichment of uranium for its Tehran Research Reactor today is likely to facilitate the new international sanctions push.
Speaking in Rome, Gates said the new sanctions would aim to pressure the Iranian regime, and not the Iranian people.
Iran is expecting a new round of street protests this week on the occasion of the 31st anniversary of the Iranian Revolution, on February 11th.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Sunday that Al Qaeda has grown more “creative and flexible” since 2001.
“I don't see them as stronger,” said Clinton, appearing as the first guest of Candy Crowley, the new host of CNN’s “State of the Union.” “I see that they are more creative, more flexible, more agile. They evolve.”
“The biggest nightmare that any of us have,” she said later in the interview, “is that one of these terrorist member organizations within this syndicate of terror will get their hands on a weapon of mass destruction.”
Clinton also – perhaps inadvertently – referred to Iran as a “nuclear-armed country,” when asked by Crowley about the nations that pose the greatest threat to the United States.
“You know, Candy, in terms of a country obviously a nuclear armed country, like North Korea or Iran, pose both a real or a potential threat,” Clinton said.
Asked by Crowley, “And you're convinced Iran has nuclear arms,” Clinton hastened to clarify her comment.
“No. No. No,” she said. “ But — but we — we believe that their behavior certainly is evidence of their intentions. And how close they are – may be subject to some debate.”
Clinton said, though, “that most of us believe the greater threats are the trans-national non-state networks. Primarily the extremists – the fundamentalist Islamic extremists who are connected, Al Qaeda in the Arab Peninsula. Al Qaeda in Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Al Qaida in the Maghreb. I mean the kind of connectivity that exists. And they continue to try to increase the sophistication of their capacity. The attacks that they're going to make.”
Asked if Iran and North Korea have responded to Obama’s offer to “extend a hand if you are willing to unclench your fist," Clinton flatly said “no.”
But, she said, “engagement has brought us a lot in the last year,” and that Obama’s “election, and his persona combined with the approach we took of seeking to find the basis for engagement on mutual respect, and mutual interest has really created a much more open, receptive atmosphere.”
Clinton also gave a tepid endorsement to Afghan president Hamid Karzai, saying that the United States works with leaders it does not agree with all the time, based on what’s in America’s best interest. “I mean we — we — we do business with leaders all the time. Some of whom are great American allies that have a lot of questions raised about them,” Clinton said. “But we do an assessment. What's in the best interest of America? What's in our national security?”
On two personal questions at the end of the interview, Clinton said she doesn’t follow football and can’t predict the winner of the Super Bowl today, and that Chelsea Clinton, who recently got engaged, doesn’t yet have a dress picked out for the wedding.
"
Source link ===========================================
"
"
Hillary Clinton Says al-Qaeda Groups Pose Bigger Threat Than Iran or North Korea
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Sunday that while North Korea and Iran are the nations that pose the biggest security threat to the U.S. because of their pursuit of nuclear weapons, the greater danger is from the "transnational, non-state networks" of al-Qaeda branches around the world.
Asked on CNN's State of the Union to name the country that is most dangerous to the U.S., Clinton said, "In terms of a country, obviously a nuclear-armed country like North Korea or Iran pose both a real or a potential threat."
Clinton said attempts to engage with North Korea had "brought us a lot in the last year" but "not to the extent we would like to see."
She said that Iran has not yet progressed to possessing nuclear arms, but said "We believe that their behavior certainly is evidence of their intentions, and how close they are may be subject to some debate. But the failure to disclose the facility at Qom, the facility to accept what was a very reasonable offer by Russia, France and the U.S. through the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) to take their ... their low- enriched uranium and return it for their research reactor ... It's like an old saying that if you see a turtle on the fence post in the middle of the woods, he didn't get there by accident, right? Somebody put him there."
But Clinton said, "I think that most of us believe the greater threats are the transnational non-state networks, primarily the extremists -- the fundamentalist Islamic extremists who are connected, al Qaeda in the Arab Peninsula, al Qaeda in Pakistan and Afghanistan, al Qaeda in the Maghreb, I mean, the kind of connectivity that exists."
Al-Qaeda in the Arab Peninsula was the group that armed and trained a 23 year old Nigerian man, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, to bomb a U.S. airliner on Christmas Day, an attack that failed when the explosives concealed in his clothing failed to detonate.
The al-Qaeda groups around the world "continue to try to increase the sophistication of their capacity, the attacks that they're going to make," Clinton said. "The biggest nightmare that any of us have is that one of these terrorists member organizations within this syndicate of terror will get their hands on a weapon of mass destruction. So that's really the most threatening prospect we see."
This weekend, veteran CNN reporter Candy Crowley takes on a high-profile role in the often rough-and-tumble world of Sunday morning talk shows. As the new host of CNN's "State of the Union," Crowley will be the only female anchor in that time slot, and the first since Cokie Roberts stepped down as co-anchor of ABC's "This Week" in 2002.
Crowley has spent her adult life as a destroyer of heels and soles: a beat reporter and a political reporter, out on the streets, pounding pavements, getting on and off airplanes and spending nights in (some dingy, some palace-like) hotel rooms. From Bill Clinton's impeachment to Hillary Clinton's bid for the White House, Crowley has been in the front row asking questions.
Disclosure: I have known Candy for more than two decades -- since the time we covered Washington for two different radio networks. We worked as correspondents for NBC News back in the day, although in different bureaus and at different times. We've run into each other professionally on occasion (most recently last June, when we were honored with awards from the Women's Media Center ), but we have never socialized together.
After a half-hour phone conversation with Crowley this week, my impression is that she's up to her new task: She's a happy, smart, hard-working, well-grounded individual.
Is this your dream job?
You know, that would assume that I had dreamed of it. I didn't begin to dream of it until the opening came up. I said, "I'm going to call them up and say I want it." It was not in my sights.
Where was your career headed?
My whole career was not headed here. My career has been, well, organic. It's really good to have goals, but one shouldn't be so focused that you don't look right or left to see that there are other things out there. In many ways life has handed me many things I would not have expected, and this is one of them.
Do you feel like you're making history?
No, because I don't know what that feels like. In truth, I looked upon this first as a journalistic opportunity. It wasn't until Monday when my e-mail began to be flooded, that I realized this is something! I kind of expected that women might have written to me. But I didn't expect the outpouring from young women, strangers and people within and outside of our company. Then I said to myself: Wow! Well, good! If my new job is helpful to any young or old woman anywhere, then yay, I will raise the flag. But mainly I think of it as a journalistic challenge. At the same time, I'm clearly a woman. I'm telling the honest truth here. If you asked me: Who is Candy Crowley? I would say I'm a mother, I'm a journalist and I'm a daughter, a sister. I certainly am a woman and I would have gotten to that, but it's not my first self-identifier.
What was key to your rising in such a tough, competitive corporate environment?
Here at CNN we did a thing not too long ago that Dana Perino [former spokeswoman for President George W. Bush] suggested we do. She set up an event called "One Minute Mentoring." She brought together successful women and young women who were just starting out on Capitol Hill and at various media outlets. She asked the speakers to bring three top tips to give to these young women. My first and most important was to be who you are. Especially in journalism, which is about the truth. You also have to be lucky and I was enormously lucky. There is an enormous amount of being in the right place at the right time. But you have to stick with who you are and it's either got to work or it's not going to work. In the end, it was the most comfortable place for me to be. I guess if there's a secret, it's that I've been very, very lucky and I have an enormously supportive family.
Where has it not worked for you?
Oh, you know, there have been setbacks all along. Certainly you think to yourself, "I should have been given that job or beat or assignment, et cetera." "Nightline" was nirvana for journalism and I would have loved to have had a job there. But they had incredibly talented people there and they didn't need me. It didn't work out. I look at it now and I think back and it makes so much more sense if you look backward. Now I can say to myself that if that had happened, this never would have happened. And the truth is, if I got what used to be my dream job, I wouldn't be sitting here doing a dream job that I never dreamed of. So setbacks can be small things, like why I didn't get assigned a story, or big things, like why I didn't get a job. But you keep going and Jupiter aligns with Mars.
Do women have parity in broadcasting?
I would say no, I don't think so. But neither do minorities. Things are better but we are not there. It is a work in progress and it will get better still.
From what you do, from what I do, from what Andrea Mitchell does -- any time young women can take sustenance from that to keep going, then hallelujah!
Are women closer to parity in other fields?
I know they are, but I don't know in which fields. One of my sons is spending year in New Zealand and he took us to a dinner with a lot of doctors. He and my daughter-in-law are both doctors there. And we got into a discussion of whether it helps or hurts to be a female doctor versus female as journalist. My daughter-in-law thinks it actually helped her to be female in certain ways. And so in some ways, it can help. It can also hurt. Depends on who's making the selection.
Do you mentor young women, young journalists?
I try. In some official capacity? No. Do I address women young when they come in here? Yes. I answer young women's questions and try to help anytime I can. But it all comes down to time.
Are you or have you been called a feminist?
I don't know if I've ever been called it, but it depends on your definition. If it means being for equal rights and equal opportunity for women, you betcha! I think the term used to be disparaged, but I think that era is over frankly. There was a point when feminism was used as a pejorative term in the political world. But it's not a pejorative to me. And it's not a loaded word anymore.
Will the audience change when you take over "State of the Union"?
I haven't the vaguest idea. [snip]
As someone who's covered Washington politics, do you believe in bipartisanship?
Sure, it can exist where there's mutual agreement on something. But let's face it, bipartisanship generally is used as a term with one side when the other disagrees. On the other hand, that's why we have two parties. Or more, actually. Our system was set up to tolerate political differences. The majority also has to have a brake somewhere, and that's always been the minority [which can put brakes on programs backed by the majority].
Has the angry cross-talk increased in recent years?
I think sometimes when people refer to a lack of bipartisanship, I think they mean civility. If you look at President Obama last week [speaking at a Republican gathering] they didn't agree on much but they weren't calling each other names. I think that's what people are talking about. Politics has gotten uncivil and that's what people don't like. It's become like some awful kindergarten class.
How do you think Secretary of State Clinton is handling her job and and accomplishing her goal of offering special help for women and girls?
I don't know. I haven't watched that. But I will tell you this: Take a look at her approval ratings. They're way higher than the president's. People think she's doing a great job and she's one smart woman who works very hard, and it's hard to fail with that combination. (Emphasis added)
What's your favorite story that you have covered?
Oh, they are all my children. [snip]
Any tips to young parents on juggling career and family?
Afghan President Hamid Karzai is trying hard to allay Western concerns such as corruption since being sworn in for a second term last November, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Sunday.
Sunday, February 07, 2010 By: AFP writers
WASHINGTON, February 7, 2010 (AFP) - Afghan President Hamid Karzai is trying hard to allay Western concerns such as corruption since being sworn in for a second term last November, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Sunday.
"I've spent a lot of time with President Karzai, most recently about a 90-minute one-on-one conversation in London. I think he has really stepped up since his second inaugural address," Clinton told CNN's "State of the Union."
"I think we have developed a much stronger understanding and partnership in the last year going forward."
US President Barack Obama was criticized by some in December for surging 30,000 extra troops into the fast worsening Afghan war because Karzai was not viewed as a reliable partner.
Discussions at a major conference in London last week focused on how to stabilize Afghanistan and bolster Karzai, who was re-elected in November in polls tainted by corruption, as well as on reconciliation with militants willing to stop fighting his government.
Clinton: Islamic Extremist Groups Pose Greatest Security Threat to US
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton says trans-national Islamic extremist networks pose greater threats to the United States than the nuclear programs of Iran and North Korea.
Clinton says the Obama administration is concerned about connections between non-state groups loyal to al-Qaida with bases in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Yemen and North Africa. She was speaking in an interview with U.S. television network CNN, broadcast Sunday.
Clinton says a nuclear-armed Iran or North Korea also pose both a "real or potential threat" to the United States. Iran denies seeking nuclear weapons and says its atomic program is peaceful.
North Korea has tested nuclear weapons and has blocked six-party talks on dismantling that program in return for international aid and other incentives.
Clinton says she does not believe Iran possesses a nuclear weapon, but says Tehran's behavior is evidence of its intentions. She noted what she called Iran's "failure" to disclose its uranium enrichment facility near the city of Qom until after it began building the site.
Iran revealed the existence of the previously-secret facility last September, triggering outrage from Western nations who suspect Iran is enriching uranium to develop nuclear weapons.
Clinton also criticized Tehran for refusing to accept what she called a "very reasonable" U.N.-brokered proposal for sending Iran's low-enriched uranium to Russia and France for processing into fuel. Western nations fear unsupervised enrichment could feed a nuclear weapon program.
The U.S. secretary of state defended the Obama administration's policy of pursuing engagement with Tehran and Pyongyang to try to resolve disputes about their nuclear programs.
She says North Korea's lack of response to U.S. engagement efforts persuaded Russia and China to sign on to what she called "very strong" sanctions against Pyongyang that are being enforced worldwide.
Clinton also says the rest of the world is beginning to see Iran's nuclear program the way Washington sees it, because of what she called "very slow and steady U.S. diplomacy."
" (LEAD) U.S. to continue engaging N. Korea for 6-way talks: Clinton
By Hwang Doo-hyong
WASHINGTON, Feb. 7 (Yonhap) -- U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Sunday said the Obama administation will continue engaging North Korea to convince the communist state to return to stalled international nuclear talks.
"Engagement has brought us a lot in the last year," Clinton said in an interview with CNN's "State of the Union." "In North Korea, when we said that we were willing to work with North Korea if they were serious about returning to the Six-Party Talks and about denuclearizing in an irreversible way, they basically did not respond in the first instance."
She described North Korea as a nuclear-armed state, while noting non-state networks like al-Qaida pose the greater threat.
"A nuclear-armed country like North Korea or Iran poses both a real or a potential threat," she said. "But I think that most of us believe the greater threats are the transnational non-state networks, primarily the extremists, the fundamentalist Islamic extremists who are connected to al-Qaida in the Arab Peninsula, al-Qaida in Pakistan and Afghanistan, al-Qaida in the Maghreb."
With regard to Pyongyang, the Obama's administration's continued engagement produced strong international coordination to adopt U.N. sanctions to pressure the impoverised North back to the nuclear talks, Clinton said. "But because we were willing to engage, we ended up getting a very strong sanctions regime against North Korea that China signed onto and Russia signed onto and right now is being enforced around the world," Clinton said.
China, North Korea's staunchest communist ally, has agreed to the sanctions resolutions due to the U.S. continued engagement, she said.
"Because we extended it, a neighbor like China knew we were going the extra mile and all of a sudden said you're not just standing there hurling insults at them, you've said all right, fine, we're willing to work with them," she said. "They haven't responded, so we're going to sign on to these very tough measures."
The sanctions imposed after North Korea's nuclear and missile tests early last year prompted the North to boycott the six-party talks, involving the two Koreas, the U.S., China, Japan and Russia.
North Korea has demanded that, prior to the resumption of the nuclear talks, sanctions be lifted and a peace treaty be signed to replace the armistice that ended the 1950-53 Korean War.
Washington insists that Pyongyang return to the six-party talks before discussing sanctions or any other issues involved.
Wang Jiarui, the head of the international department of the Chinese Communist Party, is currently in Pyongyang to help jumpstart the deadlocked nuclear talks which have been on and off since their inception in 2003.
[snip]
In another conciliatory gesture, North Korea Saturday freed Robert Park citing the "sincere repentance of his wrongdoings."
The 28-year-old Korean American activist illegally entered the North on Christmas Day to draw international attention to the North's human rights records, believed to be among the worst in the world with several detention camps accommodating hundreds of thousands of political prisoners.
Hillarysworld -> All things Hillary -> "SOS HILLARY CLINTON ON CNN'S STATE OF THE UNION" (CNN, Youtube 2-7-10) Transcript (State.gov), Related News, blogs*****