Hillarysworld

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info
TOPIC: Clinton Signals Her Frustrations with Obama's Weak Foreign Policies (HuffPo 7/22/10)


SuperModerator

Status: Offline
Posts: 1788
Date:
Clinton Signals Her Frustrations with Obama's Weak Foreign Policies (HuffPo 7/22/10)
Permalink  
 


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/richard-grenell/clinton-signals-her-frust_b_655647.html

It sounds as if Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has had enough. Her new strong tone on North Korea is a welcome, albeit overdue, shift. The Obama administration's North Korea policy for the past 18 months has consisted of public relations ploys of pretending to get tough on the rogue state and a propensity to re-package the hard work of the Bush team and call it something new and improved.

Her announcement that the Obama administration will enforce the existing sanctions on nuclear related materials and luxury goods going in and out of North Korea is yet another example. While many members of the mainstream media have fallen for the Obama team's marketing efforts, veteran North Korea experts and UN observers aren't fooled. Still, Clinton's new forceful language signaled that even she believes the current policy isn't working and more must be done. She, seemingly alone among the Obama administration foreign policy team, is aware that success in North Korea requires more than just talking.

What Secretary Clinton really said is that the Obama administration will finally start enforcing the demands placed on North Korea during the Bush administration. Although the announcement claims to be fresh and innovative, the only thing new and improved is that the Obama team is admitting that its global celebrity status isn't enough to convince other countries to actually act on their international obligations.

Even South Korea, who has the most to lose from a provocative North Korea, isn't buying the "new" argument from the administration. "I don't really think there's anything new," Han Sung-joo, a former South Korean foreign minister, told the Christian Science Monitor. And he is correct.


The hard work the Bush team did in passing unanimous Security Council resolutions and the ridicule from Obama and Rice at the time now seems ironic given the poor performance the current administration has in passing strong resolutions. Much of the blame for the weakness belongs to Rice and her habitual silence. Rice has not conducted the hard negotiations nor done the sometimes unpopular work of engaging the UN on the United States' priority issues. When Rice does attend UN negotiations, she avoids confrontation. It took Rice 103 days to move the Security Council to issue a statement after North Korea sank a South Korean ship that killed 46 sailors. And on Iran, Rice was only able to get 12 countries to support new sanctions compared to the Bush team's unanimous support for three separate resolutions. Secretary Clinton seems all too willing to let Rice's failed record stand alone. Clinton has done little to help her fellow cabinet member with international negotiations and State Department insiders say that the two seldom speak or coordinate directly.

While Obama has long believed that his personal story alone would compel leaders to follow him, Clinton's frustration with the administration's lack of progress on issues like North Korea and Iran is beginning to bubble up. Today's tough talk of enforcing previous international obligations is the first sign Clinton has given that she is irritated with the weak Obama policies. But it isn't the first time Hillary Clinton disagreed with Barack Obama's foreign policy vision. During the 2008 campaign, candidate Clinton called candidate Obama's ideas on rogue nations "naïve". Clinton also criticized Obama as someone that "wavers from seeming to believe that mediation and meetings without preconditions can solve some of the world's most intractable problems and advocating rash unilateral military action". Clinton went on to say, "We need a president who understands there is a time for force, a time for diplomacy and a time for both." But in perhaps her strongest criticism of Obama, she said he would need "a foreign policy instruction manual" if elected.

Obama's foreign policy weakness and acquiescence has made him an international celebrity, but he isn't producing the promised results on our international priorities. The Obama team's poor performance calls into question its overly diplomatic approach and its fixation with trying to lead the world through excessive talk. But Clinton signaled that she is frustrated with just talk and wants action. Clinton's reference to the Bush administration's North Korea sanctions resolution is a sure sign she wants more than a PR strategy to deal with rogue nations. It remains to be seen if the Secretary of State has enough capital inside the administration to start teaching the President a few things about being tough with dictators.


__________________

4145952823_2e0edce16f.jpg

Nobody puts THIS baby in the corner!


Platinum

Status: Offline
Posts: 460
Date:
Permalink  
 

Oh, please, let this be a sign that she is starting to lay out her exit strategy from this administration in order to run in 2012!

Rise, Hillary, rise!


__________________
Don't blame me...I voted HILLARY!

http://www.barefootfoundation.com/index_en.php

http://www.savethechildren.org/


Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 1695
Date:
Permalink  
 

"While Obama has long believed that his personal story alone would compel leaders to follow him..."

Which version of his personal story is supposed to be so compelling? lol What a total narcissist.

Go Hillary Go. Thank heaven our SOS has a backbone. She recognizes the danger in Obama's approach. His "international celebrity" won't keep Americans safe.

What's up with HuffPo? Running out of Kool-Aide?



__________________
It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union.... Men, their rights and nothing more; women, their rights and nothing less.  ~Susan B. Anthony



Platinum

Status: Offline
Posts: 460
Date:
Permalink  
 

freespirit wrote:

"While Obama has long believed that his personal story alone would compel leaders to follow him..."

Which version of his personal story is supposed to be so compelling? lol What a total narcissist.

Go Hillary Go. Thank heaven our SOS has a backbone. She recognizes the danger in Obama's approach. His "international celebrity" won't keep Americans safe.

What's up with HuffPo? Running out of Kool-Aide?




They are now as PO'd at Obama as the rest of us because he keeps sidestepping the full progressive agenda..even with the healthcare bill, he blew off the single-payer option just to pass his "historic" bill.

And progressives are going to be more ticked off that the climate-control bill is being watered down to basically a "why even bother except it is an election year" bill.

Gotta give Obama credit though...he said he would unite and he has.  Progressives, moderates and conservatives are all fed up with this "amateur hour" excuse of an adminstration.

 And their knee-jerk firing of Sherrod shows just how juvenile this administration is.



-- Edited by VotedHillary on Friday 23rd of July 2010 01:25:52 AM

__________________
Don't blame me...I voted HILLARY!

http://www.barefootfoundation.com/index_en.php

http://www.savethechildren.org/


Diamond

Status: Offline
Posts: 4567
Date:
Permalink  
 

VotedHillary wrote:
freespirit wrote:

"While Obama has long believed that his personal story alone would compel leaders to follow him..."

Which version of his personal story is supposed to be so compelling? lol What a total narcissist.

Go Hillary Go. Thank heaven our SOS has a backbone. She recognizes the danger in Obama's approach. His "international celebrity" won't keep Americans safe.

What's up with HuffPo? Running out of Kool-Aide?


They are now as PO'd at Obama as the rest of us because he keeps sidestepping the full progressive agenda..even with the healthcare bill, he blew off the single-payer option just to pass his "historic" bill.

And progressives are going to be more ticked off that the climate-control bill is being watered down to basically a "why even bother except it is an election year" bill.

Gotta give Obama credit though...he said he would unite and he has.  Progressives, moderates and conservatives are all fed up with this "amateur hour" excuse of an adminstration.

And their knee-jerk firing of Sherrod shows just how juvenile this administration is.

-- Edited by VotedHillary on Friday 23rd of July 2010 01:25:52 AM
STAMP!  LOL. 

I had a tongue-in-cheek laugh reading about Dr.Rice's accomplishments in the UN.  Foreign policy execution is not a cake walk especially when the foreign policy leader does not get adoration and following that he takes for granted.

Hillary is executing foreign policy on the strength of her own record, merits and interpersonal skills and relationships.

I too hope that this leads to 2012 run.

Rise Hillary, Rise!!!

__________________
Democracy needs defending - SOS Hillary Clinton, Sept 8, 2010
Democracy is more than just elections - SOS Hillary Clinton, Oct 28, 2010

Madam Secretary Blog at ForeignPolicy.com
Project Vote Smart - Stay informed and engaged!


Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 798
Date:
Permalink  
 

I don't think Obama has helped our Country on foreign policy as much as Hillary has. She's been alot better to him, than I would be if I were her.

__________________


Platinum

Status: Offline
Posts: 495
Date:
Permalink  
 

many who voted obama in the primary that i know started voicing admiration for her smart power tough stance.

__________________
Amy Dugan
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard