Hillary Clinton seems quite content with the job she has, traveling the world to tamp down conflicts together with promoting better global health conditions for women and children in particular. As secretary of state, she's taken the lead in advocating "soft power" as a necessary and valuable component of American might. That's why it comes as a bit of a surprise to see Clinton touted as a possible successor to Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who plans to step down sometime next year.
This speculation has surfaced before, along with an alternate scenario that has Clinton trading places with Joe Biden to become vice president.
Hillary is now the indispensable woman, the competent, charismatic candidate for any job. Put her anywhere and watch her succeed. The fact that people in high places can imagine her as secretary of Defense, a job no woman has ever held, says a lot about her progression in the public eye, and about the acceptance of women in influential positions that were once off limits.
Of course, almost any rumor can take root in Washington in August, a time when faux news is so much more fun to talk about than the serious challenges facing the country. Still, it is a tribute to Clinton and how powerful – and popular – she has become. She already has a good job, and it's odd to think she might want to move. The secretary of State has always been considered the premiere Cabinet job, and 18 months into the administration, by all reports, she's gotten hold of the giant department and is shaping policy.
Why would she want to start all over again with another humongous bureaucracy? The answer can be found in one word: resources. The State Department is always the poor cousin when it comes to foreign intervention. State is starved for money; the Pentagon is awash in money, and therefore influence. When Clinton travels to Afghanistan, the voice that matters most is not hers, but that of Gates. With one war winding down and another scheduled to begin winding down, the Defense post is at the epicenter of policy and politics.
Clinton gets glowing reviews in the media as secretary of State, but can cite few concrete accomplishments other than projecting a positive image. That's not a shortcoming. Projecting American values abroad is what a secretary of State does, says Matt Bennett, a co-founder of Third Way, a centrist Democratic group. A secretary of State must broadcast U.S. values and "have a little bit of steel in the velvet glove, and she's done that with Israel, and with North Korea. She calibrates very well on the world stage."
The guessing game around Hillary tells us how much has changed since she campaigned unsuccessfully for the Democratic nomination. The pundits said she overstayed her welcome on the campaign trail, and that Bill Clinton was out of control, his wish to see his wife in the White House overwhelming his good sense. "Never, ever underestimate the Clintons," says Bennett. "We thought his reputation was shot and now he's back, popular as ever. They're unbelievably resilient and resourceful."
It's unlikely that anybody is sitting in the White House moving personnel boxes around on a chart, and slotting Hillary into the Defense Department. But when it comes time to name Gates' replacement, President Obama will want the very best possible person, "and that will require that he at least think about Clinton," says Bennett. "I can't imagine a single person would object to her based on her sex, and she would sail through Senate confirmation. I get why she's being considered."
And so does everybody else who's watched Clinton persevere through the trials and tribulations of a turbulent marriage, a rocky tenure in the White House, to ultimately win a Senate seat and then appointment to the highest diplomatic post in the government. Whatever comes next, she can handle it.
Articles like this just burn me to no end. She is qualified for SOS..now talk of SOD..qualified to be a Senator...a "rock" that just gets the job done.
And yet, not qualified to be POTUS?
God forbid we actually elect someone who has a CLUE!
-- Edited by VotedHillary on Thursday 19th of August 2010 01:06:35 AM
Articles like this just burn me to no end. She is qualified for SOS..now talk of SOD..qualified to be a Senator...a "rock" that just gets the job done.
And yet, not qualified to be POTUS?
God forbid we actually elect someone who has a CLUE!
-- Edited by VotedHillary on Thursday 19th of August 2010 01:06:35 AM
STAMP!!! Yeah, who'd have thunk the person that is indispensable got shoved aside and put in Foggy Bottom.
Eleanor Clift makes very good observation in that article.
I just hope the likes of Christ "Tingles-down-the-leg-for-O" Matthews wakes up to realize that all that is fancy and arugala-esque is not good enough to rise to leadership and the real deal is the one with experience, size of her ankles not-withstanding!
The thing about Hillary that people will learn sooner or later is how incredibly resilient she is. Pres.Bill Clinton himself had said something like, just let her sit and giver her a glass of water and she perks up and blooms like a plant in no time at all. What we also know of is her tenacity and incredible stick-to-it focus - she is a phenomenal listener [I am giving heightened meaning to the word phenomenal there] and with that listening and focus she is an unparelleled learner. Those skills and her love for the US makes enables her to shine and deliver.
Hillary preaches and practices "Bloom where you are planted."
Of course, people who are jaded will see ill-will in everything and will call her names. Progressive used to be a good word. It was considered a good word in early 2008 but no, not anymore. Those who are only sideline users of Clinton supporters will toss the word "progressive" and think it is bad that Hillary in 2008 called herself a progressive in the midst of a debate, having been asked to place herself along a spectrum. Listen folk, she didnt name herself a liberal. She is a moderate who truly strive for EQUALITY of all human beings. Anyone recall the "Equal Pay Act" (Lilly Ledbetter)?? She was in the WH for the signing of that even though she was already SOS -- that is because she was a key sponsor and she truly fought for that along side other fellow senators.
Hillary has a deep sense of justice and fairness, of the need for defense and offense to bring forth strategic change in pockets of the world that do not live by the natural laws of equality... and that DOES make her more hawkish than most liberals in the current administration... That and her focus on small businesses and job creation are the reasons why she is a moderate (progressive) and that is fantastic combination in a person who may rise to POTUS one day soon, citizens-willing.
But, if we get stuck on stupid and blame wife for whatever it is that the husband may have done rather than credit her for raising a tremendous child amidst controversies, if we fail to see the tremendous leadership she has provided to all around her for many decades, and the great value and leadership she is providing now, we are bound to get more hype -- and of course the parenthetic may be (D) or (R) - but in the need to bring "change" from what has become a diplorable economy, there is some fear that the swing to the (R) may lead to loss of the tremendous work towards EQUALITY that people like and including Hillary have led over the years.
If we the US are damned lucky, we will have Hillary run in 2012.
__________________
Democracy needs defending - SOS Hillary Clinton, Sept 8, 2010 Democracy is more than just elections - SOS Hillary Clinton, Oct 28, 2010
Stamping all the above. Hell No to DOD, VP, or anything other than the position that was rightfully hers to begin with. POTUS!
__________________
It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union.... Men, their rights and nothing more; women, their rights and nothing less. ~Susan B. Anthony